老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期住院患者营养风险的调查分析
作者:
作者单位:

(安徽医科大学第二附属医院全科医学科,合肥 230601)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R563

基金项目:


Investigation and analysis of nutritional risk in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Author:
Affiliation:

(Department of General Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 调查慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)住院患者营养状态,分析营养状态对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的影响。方法 选取2018年6月到2019年12月于安徽医科大学第二附属医院收治的AECOPD患者122例为研究对象,按照营养风险筛查量表(NRS2002)评分不同,分为有营养风险组(75例)和无营养风险组(47例)。比较2组患者体质量指数、生化指标、血气分析指标、呼吸衰竭发生率及住院时间。采用SPSS 23.0软件进行数据分析。根据数据类型,组间比较分别采用χ2检验或t检验。结果 有营养风险组PaCO2及COPD患者自我评估测试(CAT)评分高于无营养风险组,差异有统计学意义[(54.15±14.17)和(48.78±11.83)mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa),(15.43±4.18)和(11.67±3.37)分;均P<0.05];有营养风险组和无营养风险组PO2和pH值比较,差异均无统计学意义[(77.42±23.65)和(72.76±19.01)mmHg,(7.39±0.61)和(7.38±0.58)mmHg;均P>0.05]。有营养风险组呼吸衰竭发生率60.0%(45/75),无营养风险组为38.3%(18/47),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。有营养风险组AECOPD患者的住院时间(14.43±6.23)d,长于无营养风险组(10.19±3.37) d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 AECOPD住院患者营养不良风险发生率高。存在营养风险的AECOPD患者CAT评分高,呼吸衰竭发生率高,且住院时间长。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the nutritional status of hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and to analyze the impact of nutritional status on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)patients. Methods A total of 122 AECOPD patients admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2018 to December 2019 were selected for the study. Using Nutritional Risk Screening tool (NRS2002), the patients were divided into the group with nutritional risk (NR group, n=75) and the group without nutritional risk (non-NR group, n=47). The two groups were compared in the body mass index, biochemical indexes, blood gas analysis indexes, incidence of respiratory failure, and hospital stay. SPSS statistics 23.0 was used for statistical analysis. Depending on date type, comparison was performed using χ2 test or t test. Results The PaCO2 and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores in the NR group were higher than those in non-NR group [(54.15±14.17) vs (48.78±11.83) mmHg (1mmHg=0.133kPa), (15.43±4.18) vs (11.67±3.37) points], the difference being statistically significant (P<0.05 for both). There was no statistically significant difference in PO2 and pH between the NR group and the non-NR group [(77.42±23.65) vs (72.76±19.01) mmHg, (7.39±0.61) vs (7.38±0.58) mmHg; P>0.05 for both]. The incidence of respiratory failure in the NR group was 60.0% (45/75), and 38.3% (18/47) in the non-NR group, with significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01). The length of hospital stay in the NR group [(14.43±6.23)d] was higher than that of the non-NR group [(10.19±3.37)d], with significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01). Conclusion The hospitalized AECOPD patients have a high rate of nutritional risk, with a high CAT score, a high rate of respiratory failure and long hospitalization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵红星,王同.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期住院患者营养风险的调查分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2021,20(9):674~677

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-10
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-09-30
  • 出版日期: