针刺激痛点治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床疗效
作者:
作者单位:

(徐州医科大学附属医院疼痛科,江苏 徐州 221000)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R441.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(81571066)


Effects of acupuncture at triggering points on diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Author:
Affiliation:

(Department of Pain Management, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu Province, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨针刺激痛点治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床疗效与安全性。方法 选取2018年9月至2020年1月在徐州医科大学附属医院疼痛科住院治疗的52例糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)患者,采用随机数表法分为试验组和对照组。对照组给予口服降糖药物等基础治疗,试验组在此基础上行针刺激痛点治疗,观察并记录患者治疗前,治疗后1周、1个月、3个月与6个月的疼痛数字评分(NRS)、神经传导速度(NCV)、多伦多临床评分系统(TCSS)评估治疗效果,并计算2组患者的总有效率,同时记录整个治疗期间的不良反应。采用SPSS 23.0统计软件进行数据分析。根据数据类型,分别采用t检验、方差分析、Mann-Whitney U检验和χ2检验进行组间和组内不同时间点的比较。结果 治疗后试验组患者NRS评分较治疗前显著下降(P<0.05),且试验组NRS评分显著低于对照组同时间点(P<0.05)。试验组NCV较治疗前有所提高(P<0.05),1周后的各时间点神经传导速度均高于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组TCSS评分较治疗前明显改善(P<0.05),且试验组TCSS评分改善优于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗结束后试验组总有效率高于对照组(92%和64%,P<0.05)。所有患者在整个治疗期间,无任何严重不良事件发生。结论 针刺激痛点治疗糖尿病周围神经病变安全、有效,值得临床使用推广。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture at triggering points in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods A total of 52 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) were selected in the Pain Management Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from September 2018 to January 2020. The patients were randomized into study group and control group. Both groups actively received basic treatment. The study group was treated with acupuncture at triggering points and oral medication, while the control group with oral medication. Data were recorded of the patient′s numeric rating scale (NRS), nerve conduction velocity (NCV), and Toronto clinical scoring system (TCSS) before treatment, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment to evaluate the treatment effect, and calculate the total efficiency rate of the two groups of patients, and the adverse reactions during the entire treatment period. Data analysis was performed using SPSS statistics 23.0. Depending on the data type, t test, variance analysis, Mann-Whitey U test, and χ2 tests were used for inter-group comparison. Results After the treatment, NRS in the study group was significantly lower than that before the treatment (P<0.05), and NRS of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group at the same time (P<0.05). NCV in the study group increased as compared with before the treatment (P<0.05), and the nerve conduction velocity at each time point after 1 week was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). TCSS of the study group was significantly improved as compared with that before the treatment (P<0.05), and the improvement of the TCSS score of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). After the treatment, the total efficiency rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group (92% vs 64%,P<0.05). All patients had no serious adverse events during the entire treatment period. Conclusion It is safe and effective to treat diabetic peripheral neuropathy by acupuncture at triggering points, which is worthy of clinical application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈齐齐,李鹏飞,申文.针刺激痛点治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床疗效[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2021,20(8):561~566

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-22
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-08-30
  • 出版日期: