基于德尔菲法构建老年人功能受损评估初始量表
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 首都医科大学宣武医院老年医学科,国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心,北京 100053;2. 北京市老年病防治办公室,北京市老年病医疗研究中心,北京 100053;3. 四川大学华西医院老年病科,国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心,成都 610041;4. 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院老年医学科,上海 200025;5. 首都医科大学附属复兴医院老年医学科,北京 100038;6. 上海交通大学附属第一人民医院老年医学科,上海 200080)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R195

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2018YFC2002101,2018YFC2002100,2017YFB1401202)


Development of preliminary version of function impairment screening tool for the elderly using Delphi method
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Department of Geriatrics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Medicine, Beijing 100053, China;2. Beijing Geriatric Disease Prevention and Control Office, Beijing Geriatric Healthcare Center, Beijing 100053, China;3. Department of Gerontology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Medicine, Chengdu 610041,China;4. Department of Geriatrics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China;5. Department of Geriatrics, Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China;6. Department of Geriatrics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080,China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 构建适合我国老年人的功能受损评估初始量表。方法 通过检索和复习文献,选取与老年功能评估相关的量表,通过专家小组讨论形成条目池。采用德尔菲专家咨询法筛选条目,使用电子邮箱将功能受损评估量表专家咨询问卷发放给25名专家,专家对条目的重要性及可行性评分,并填写判断依据和熟悉程度。根据专家意见筛选条目,计算各指标得分平均值和变异系数,形成老年人功能受损评估初始量表。结果 经文献检索和专家小组讨论,共筛选25个二级指标的条目池。两轮咨询专家积极系数为80%和100%,权威系数为0.94和0.90。第一轮条目的重要性Kendall协调系数为0.26(P<0.001),可行性Kendall协调系数0.28(P<0.001)。第二轮条目重要性Kendall协调系数为0.39(P<0.001),可行性Kendall协调系数0.37(P<0.001)。根据得分情况及专家修改意见,最终形成3个一级指标和18个二级指标。结论 通过德尔菲专家咨询法构建了包含3个一级指标和18个二级指标的老年人功能受损评估初始量表。

    Abstract:

    Objective To develop the preliminary version of function impairment screening tool (FIST) for the elderly Chinese population. Methods We selected the scales related to function assessment for the elderly by searching and reviewing literature and established an item pool after panel discussion. Then we filtered the items using the Delphi Method. A FIST questionnaire was emailed to 25 experts who evaluated the items in terms of their importance and feasibility and provided basis of judgement and familiarity. A preliminary version of FIST was determined after the items were screened according to the opinions of experts as specified by the average value and coefficient of variation. Results Literature searching and expert panel resulted in a secondary level of 25 items. In the first and second rounds of panel discussion, the coefficients of positivity were 80% and 100% and the degree of authority 0.94 and 0.90, respectively. The Kendall′s concordance coefficient of importance was 0.26 (P<0.001) for the first round and 0.39 (P<0.001) for the second round. The Kendall′s concordance coefficient of importance of applicability was 0.28 (P<0.001) for the first round and 0.37 for the second round (P<0.001). Based on the scores and expert opinions, 3 first-level and 18 second-level indicators were finally retained. Conclusion The preliminary version of the FIST for the elderly with 3 first-level and 18 second-level indicators was established using Delphi method.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张亚欣,汤哲,杨茗,吴方,王青,倪秀石,王鹏,孙菲,李耘,吴锦晖,马丽娜.基于德尔菲法构建老年人功能受损评估初始量表[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2021,20(2):86~91

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-03-01
  • 出版日期: