潜在不适当用药与衰弱老年人不良结局的相关分析
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 首都医科大学附属复兴医院综合科,北京 100038;2. 首都医科大学附属复兴医院药剂科,北京 100038;首都医科大学附属宣武医院:;3. 药物研究室,;4. 循证医学中心,北京 100053)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R592;R917

基金项目:

北京市西城区卫生健康委员会科技新星项目(XWKX2018-01)


Correlation analysis of potentially inappropriate medications and adverse outcomes in frail elderly
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Department of Integration, ;2. Department of Pharmacy, Fuxing Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China;3. Department of Pharmacology, ;4. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评估潜在不适当用药(PIM)与衰弱老年人不良结局的相关性。方法 入选2015年1月至2017年12月首都医科大学附属复兴医院综合科老年衰弱患者226例进行研究,根据美国老年医学会Beers标准(2015版)将患者纳入PIM组(n=169)和非PIM组(n=57),比较2组患者日常生活能力(ADL)、认知功能和查尔森共病指数(CCI)等老年综合评估情况。随访截止2018年12月,不良结局终点事件包括非计划再入院和全因死亡。应用SPSS 23.0统计软件对数据进行分析。Cox回归分析PIM与衰弱患者临床不良结局的相关性,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析2组患者生存率的差异。结果 PIM检出率为74.8%(169/226),PIM药物中雷贝拉唑占52.7%(89/169),艾司唑仑占42.6%(72/169)。PIM组较非PIM组患者口服药种类和疾病数明显增多,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Cox 回归分析结果表明PIM(HR=1.425,5%CI 1.005~2.021;P=0.047)、年龄(HR=1.047,5%CI 1.013~1.083;P=0.007)和CCI(HR=1.095,5%CI 1.014~1.182;P=0.021)与不良结局相关。Kaplan-Meier分析表明PIM组与非PIM组衰弱老年患者生存率差异有统计学意义(P=0.033)。结论 PIM与衰弱老年人不良结局相关,应加强衰弱筛查及临床合理用药。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the correlation between potential inappropriate medications (PIM) and adverse outcomes in frail elderly. Methods A total of 226 elderly suffering from senile debility in Fuxing Hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 were recruited, and then divided into PIM group (n=169) and non-PIM group (n=57) according to Beers Standard of American Geriatrics Association (2015 edition). Their daily living ability (ADL), cognitive function and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were compared between the 2 groups. All patients were followed up till December 2018, and unplanned readmission and all-cause death were regarded as the end-points of adverse outcomes. SPSS statistics 23.0 was used for data analysis. Cox regression analysis was employed to analyze the correlation between PIM and adverse outcomes in the frail patients, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to analyze the differences in survival rates between the 2 groups. Results The detection rate of PIM was 74.8%(169/226). Rabeprazole accounted for 52.7%(89/169) and Estazolam for 42.6%(72/169) among all PIM drugs. Compared with non-PIM group, the types of oral drugs and the number of diseases were significantly larger in PIM group (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that PIM (HR=1.425, 95%CI 1.005-2.021; P=0.047), age (HR=1.047,5%CI 1.013-1.083; P=0.007) and CCI (HR=1.095, 95%CI 1.014-1.182; P=0.021) were associated with adverse outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was significant difference in survival rate between PIM group and non-PIM group (P=0.033). Conclusion PIM is related to the adverse outcomes of patients with senile debility. We should strengthen the screening of senile debility and rational drug use in clinical practice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王鹏,王青,李放,边萌,陈洁若,路菲,张兰,杨昆.潜在不适当用药与衰弱老年人不良结局的相关分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2019,18(8):573~577

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-08-24
  • 出版日期: