老年房颤患者认知功能障碍分析
作者:
作者单位:

(1.首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院 医疗保健中心心血管内科,北京 100050;2.首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院 药剂科,北京 100050)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R592;R541.7+5

基金项目:


An analysis of cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Department of Geriatric Cardiology, Beijing 100050, China;2. Department of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨老年房颤(AF)患者认知功能障碍特点。方法 回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年12月首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院医疗保健中心心血管内科住院的老年患者165例,根据是否患有AF分为AF组83例和非AF组82例。通过蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和简易智能状态检查量表(MMSE)评估2组患者的认知功能。采用SPSS 24.0统计软件对数据进行分析。组间比较采用t检验、非参数秩和检验或χ2检验。结果 MoCA评估结果表明AF组患者71.1%(59/83)存在认知功能障碍,非AF组患者56.10%(46/82)存在认知功能障碍,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与非AF组患者相比,AF组患者视空间与执行功能[(3.17±1.64) vs(3.96±1.23)分]、言语功能[(1.98±1.00) vs(2.34±0.95)分]、抽象思维[(1.27±0.75) vs(1.56±0.67)分]、定向力[(5.20±0.85) vs(5.50±1.10)分]得分以及总分[(20.27±6.83) vs(23.16±5.78)分]均低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MMSE评估结果表明AF组患者31.3%(26/83)存在认知功能障碍,非AF组患者18.3%(15/82)存在认知功能障碍,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。AF组相比非AF组患者时间定向[(3.92±1.60) vs(4.40±1.20)分]、地点定向[(4.66±0.89) vs(4.89±0.45)分]、注意和计算力[(3.39±1.80) vs(3.94±1.40)分]、物体命名[(1.98±0.15) vs(2.35±0.78)分]、图形描绘得分[(0.73±0.44) vs(0.90±0.30)分]以及总分[(24.90±5.87) vs(26.79±4.20)分]均低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 AF患者认知功能障碍主要表现在视空间与执行功能、言语功能、抽象思维、时间和方向定向、注意和计算力、物体命名和图形描绘方面,极大影响老年人的日常生活,积极转复或维持AF患者窦房结节律,可提高患者的生活质量。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the characteristics of cognitive dysfunction in the elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods A retrospective analysis was made of 165 elderly patients hospitalized in the Department of Geriatric Cardiology of Beijing Friendship Hospital from January 2016 to December 2017, who were divided into AF group (83) and non-AF group (82). Cognitive function was assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE). SPSS statistics 24.0 was used for data analysis, and Student′s t test, nonparametric rank sum test or Chi-square test for comparison between the groups. Results MoCA assessment showed that 71.1% (59/83) in the AF group had cognitive dysfunction against 56.10%(46/82) in the non-AF group (P<0.05). Compared with the AF group, the non-AF group scored lower in the visuospatial and executive function [(3.17±1.64) vs (3.96±1.23)], language [(1.98±1.00) vs (2.34±0.95)], abstraction [(1.27±0.75) vs (1.56±0.67)] and orientation [(5.20±0.85) vs (5.50±1.10)] and total score [(20.27±6.83) vs (23.16±5.78)], the differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). MMSE showed that 31.3% (26/83) in the AF group had cognitive dysfunction against 18.3% (15/82) in the non-AF group with a difference of statistical significance (P<0.05). Compared with the AF group, the non-AF group had lower scores in the time orientation [(3.92±1.60) vs (4.40±1.20)], place orientation [(4.66±0.89) vs (4.89±0.45)], attention and calculation [(3.39±1.80) vs (3.94±1.40)], object naming [(1.98±0.15) vs (2.35±0.78)], and graphic description [(0.73±0.44) vs (0.90±0.30)], and total score [(24.90±5.87) vs (26.79±4.20)], the differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Cognitive dysfunction in AF patients featuresmainly in visuospatial and executive function, language, abstraction, time and place orientation, attention and calculation, object naming, and graphic description, which greatly affects the daily life of the elderly. Active recovery or maintenance of sinoatrial nodular rhythm in AF patients can improve their quality of life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴汀溪,卫红涛,李丹丹,程晟,邢云利.老年房颤患者认知功能障碍分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2018,17(9):667~671

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-29
  • 最后修改日期:2018-06-20
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-09-26
  • 出版日期: