老年高血压病患者治疗达标后血压昼夜节律变化特点及影响因素
作者:
作者单位:

(北京大学第三医院老年内科,北京 100191)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R592; R544.1

基金项目:


Alteration characteristics and influencing factors of circadian rhythm of blood pressure in the elderly with well-controlled hypertension
Author:
Affiliation:

(Department of Geriatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 研究老年高血压病患者治疗达标后血压昼夜节律变化特点及影响因素。方法 连续选取2016年1月至2017年3月在北京大学第三医院老年内科住院治疗并治疗达标的高血压病患者,对其进行24 h动态血压监测,根据夜间血压下降率分为3组:杓型血压组(n=48)、非杓型血压组(n=91)和反杓型血压组(n=73)。比较各组间基础资料、血压监测数值、生化指标及靶器官损害情况。采用SPSS 17.0软件进行数据处理。依据数据类型,组间比较分别采用t检验或χ2检验。采用多因素logistic回归分析筛选出影响杓型血压的独立危险因素。结果 与杓型血压组比较,非杓型血压组和反杓型血压组患者的年龄[(78.96±6.86) vs(82.59±5.85) vs(75.75±7.43)岁]更高、体质量指数(BMI)[(25.23±3.57) vs(25.01±3.76) vs(22.43±2.62)kg/m2]更大、有脑血管病史(17.6% vs 35.6% vs 14.6%)的患者更多、夜间平均收缩压[(123.04±15.67) vs(137.19±19.11) vs(111.31±12.30)mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)]和夜间平均舒张压[(64.88±8.02) vs(69.18±9.76)vs(61.38±7.48)mmHg]更高,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);与杓型血压组比较,反杓型血压组患者的肌酐清除率[(57.59±12.89) vs(48.59±13.86)ml/min]显著降低(P<0.05)。非杓型血压组和反杓型血压组患者中有颈动脉斑块的人数比例显著高于杓型血压组(90.1% vs 97.3% vs 72.9%,P<0.05)。logistic多因素回归分析结果显示:年龄(95%CI:1.35~5.95,P=0.006)、BMI(95%CI:1.43~5.91,P=0.003)、颈动脉斑块(95%CI:1.25~5.12,P=0.010)为影响杓型血压的独立危险因素。结论 血压治疗达标的老年高血压病患者仍存在血压昼夜节律异常。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the alteration characteristics and the influencing factors of the circadian rhythm of blood pre-ssure in the senile patients with well-controlled hypertension. Methods A total of 215 consecutive senile patients with hypertension well controlled who were hospitalized in our Department of Geriatrics from January 2016 to March 2017 were enrolled in this study. The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed on all patients, and according to their decline rate of nocturnal blood pre-ssure, they were divided into 3 groups:dipper blood pressure group (n=48), non-dipper blood pressure group (n=91) and anti-dipper blood pressure group (n=73). The baseline information, results of ambulatory blood pressure, results of biochemical blood examination, and target organ damage were compared among the 3 groups. SPSS statistics 17.0 was used to perform the statistical analysis. Student’s t test or Chi-square test was employed to analyze different data types. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to screen the independent risk factors for dipper blood pressure. Results Compared with the dipper blood pressure group, the non-dipper and anti-dipper blood pressure groups had significantly older age [(78.96±6.86) vs (82.59±5.85) vs (75.75±7.43)years], higher body mass index [(25.23±3.57) vs (25.01±3.76) vs (22.43±2.62)kg/m2], higher ratio of patients with cerebrovascular disease history (17.6% vs 35.6% vs 14.6%), and higher nocturnal systolic [(123.04±15.67) vs (137.19±19.11) vs(111.31±12.30)mmHg, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa] and diastolic blood pressure [(64.88±8.02) vs (69.18±9.76) vs (61.38±7.48)mmHg, all P<0.05]. Creatinine clearance rate (CCr) was obviously lower in the anti-dipper group than the dipper blood pressure group [(48.95±13.86) vs (57.59±12.89)ml/min, P<0.05]. There were more patients having carotid atherosclerotic plagues in the non-dipper and anti-dipper groups than the dipper blood pressure group (90.1% vs 97.3% vs 72.9%, P<0.05). Multiple logisticregression analysis showed that age (95%CI:1.35-5.95, P=0.006), BMI (95%CI:1.43-5.91, P=0.003) and carotid plaque (95%CI:1.25-5.12, P=0.010) were independent risk factors for dipper blood pressure. Conclusion Abnormal circadian rhythm of blood pressure are still seen in the elderly patients with well-controlled hypertension.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邱萌,朱昀,张福春,张帆.老年高血压病患者治疗达标后血压昼夜节律变化特点及影响因素[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2018,17(3):192~196

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-30
  • 最后修改日期:2017-12-14
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-03-28
  • 出版日期: