老年慢性射血分数保留心力衰竭的危险因素分析及其与脑啡肽酶的相关性研究
作者:
作者单位:

(首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院医疗保健中心心血管内科,北京 100050)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R592; R541.4

基金项目:

北京市优秀人才青年骨干项目(2014000021469G265);首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院科研启动基金(yyqdkt2015-26)


Risk factors for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its correlation with serum neprilysin in the elderly
Author:
Affiliation:

(Department of Geriatric Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 明确老年慢性射血分数保留心力衰竭(HFpEF)的独立危险因素及HFpEF与血清脑啡肽酶(NEP)的关系。方法 入选2014年1月至2017年1月在首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院医疗保健中心心血管病房住院的老年慢性HFpEF患者31例。同时选取性别、年龄、患病及用药情况与之相匹配的同期住院的非心力衰竭患者25例作为对照组。通过酶联免疫法测定血清NEP的浓度,比较两组NEP及其他参数的差异。采用SPSS 16.0软件进行数据处理。根据数据类型,分别采用t检验或χ2检验。参数检验采用Pearson相关分析,非参数检验采用Spearman相关分析。建立logistic回归模型,采用逐步向后法分析HFpEF的独立危险因素。结果 与对照组相比,HFpEF组的NT-proBNP[(3857.7±618.7) vs(1960.3±331.4)ng/L,P=0.000]、血尿酸[(363.34±147.56) vs(332.11±84.58)μmol/L,P=0.042]、左房内径[(44.29±7.34) vs(37.59±2.97)mm,P=0.007]及左心室舒张末期内径[(54.43±8.41) vs(49.13±2.77)mm,P=0.013]均显著增加,而血清NEP[(0.82±0.33) vs(0.98±0.62)ng/ml,P=0.001]水平显著降低,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。调整混杂变量后,仅NT-proBNP(95%CI:1.000~1.004,P=0.037)是HFpEF的独立预测因子。NEP与NT-proBNP、NYHA分级及超声心动指标均不具有相关性,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 NT-proBNP是老年HFpEF的独立危险因素,血清NEP与NT-proBNP无相关性,对老年HFpEF风险的预测价值有限。

    Abstract:

    Objective To determine the independent risk factors for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in the elderly and investigate the correlation between HFpEF and serum neprilysin (NEP). Methods A total of 56 consecutive patients admitted in the cardiovascular ward of the healthcare center of our hospital from January 2014 to January 2017 were enrolled in this study. Thirty-one HFpEF patients served as HFpEF group. Another 25 non-heart failure patients who matched with the HFpEF group in age, gender, comorbidity and medication and hospitalized in the same period served as control group. Serum NEP level was tested in the 2 groups by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the results and other parameters were compared between the 2 groups. SPSS statistics 16.0 was used to perform the statistical analysis. Data were analyzed by Student’s t test or Chi-square test as appropriate. Parametric and non-parametric test were performed by Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis, respectively. Binary stepwise backwards logistic regression analysis was carried out to assess the independent risk factors for HFpEF. Results Compared with control group, the HFpEF group had significantly higher serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level [(3857.7±618.7) vs (1960.3±331.4)ng/L, P=0.000], serum uric acid level [(363.34±147.56) vs (332.11±84.58)μmol/L,P=0.042], left atrial diameter [(44.29±7.34) vs (37.59±2.97)mm, P=0.007], and left ventricular end diastolic diameter [(54.43±8.41) vs (49.13±2.77)mm, P=0.013], while obviously lower serum NEP level [(0.82±0.33) vs (0.98±0.62)ng/ml, P=0.001]. Only NT-proBNP was the independent risk factor for HFpEF in this cohort (95%CI:1.000-1.004,P=0.037) after adjustment of the confounding variables. There was no correlations of serum NEP level with NT-proBNP level, NYHA class and echocardiographic parameters (all P>0.05). Conclusion NT-proBNP is an independent risk factor for HFpEF in the elderly. Serum NEP has no correlation with NT-proBNP, and shows limited predictive value for HFpEF.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

黄樱硕,王倩倩,黄蔚,王梦然,邢云利,孙颖.老年慢性射血分数保留心力衰竭的危险因素分析及其与脑啡肽酶的相关性研究[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2017,16(11):807~811

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-10
  • 最后修改日期:2017-09-05
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-11-24
  • 出版日期: