维持性血液透析老年患者血管通路的特点
作者:
作者单位:

(南京医科大学第一附属医院老年肾科,南京 210029)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R:473.5

基金项目:


Characteristics of vascular access in elderly patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis
Author:
Affiliation:

(Department of Geriatric Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 本研究主要对老年(≥65岁)维持性血液透析(血透)患者的血管通路特点进行分析,旨在为老年血液透析患者的血管通路维护提供经验。方法 收集老年血液透析患者的一般资料,依导入透析时的年龄分为两组,老年组(≥65岁)116例,中年组(<65岁)130例,分析血管通路种类、建立和使用特点。采用SPSS 15.0软件对数据进行分析。计量资料以均数±标准差表示,两组间比较采用t检验。计数资料以百分率表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。结果 老年组采用导管比例高于中年组(44% vs 10%,P=0.006),女性采用导管者众。老年组经急诊导入透析比例高(19.0% vs 5.4%, P=0.008)。老年组合并糖尿病、心脑血管疾病和外周血管疾病的比例增高,但在合并糖尿病或外周血管疾病的老年患者中,采用内瘘与采用导管的比例相似(50.7% vs 49.3%, P=0.217)。老年导管组营养状况[体质量指数(BMI)、血红蛋白和白蛋白]较其他组差(P=0.007, P=0.006, P=0.007)。老年组的肘瘘比例高于中年组(8.3% vs 0.9%, P<0.001)。老年组的内瘘初始通畅时间短(P=0.009),但累积通畅时间与中年组相近,其中经干预的比例高(P=0.006)。老年组内瘘成熟不良发生率高(10.0% vs 3.5%,P=0.008)。老年组使用带涤纶套的导管比例高(30.4% vs 0.0%,P<0.005),两组导管通畅时间无明显差异,但老年组的导管感染率高(21.7% vs 15.3%,P=0.006)。结论 相对年轻患者,老年透析患者导管使用率和导管感染率均高,但通畅情况相似。老年透析患者肘瘘比例高,内瘘不易成熟且通畅情况略逊,但经积极处理可与年轻人接近。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the features of vascular access in the elderly patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) (≥ 65 years old) in order to provide experiences for long-term vascular access patency. Methods Clinical data of MHD patients admitted in our department from March 2009 to March 2013 were collected and retrospectively analyzed in this study. According to their age, the patients were divided into the elderly group (≥65 years old, n=116), and the middle-aged group (< 65 years old, n=130). The types, construction and usage of vascular access were analyzed. SPSS statistics 15.0 was used to analyze the data. The measurement data were expressed as mean±standard deviation ([AKx-D]±s), and Student’s t test was employed for the comparison between groups. Enumeration data were expressed as percentage, and inter-group comparison was carried out with Chi-square test. Results The proportion of catheterization was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the middle-aged group (44% vs 10%, P=0.006), and it was more common in female patients regardless of the age. The elderly patients had obviously higher ratio of emergency (19.0% vs 5.4%, P=0.008), and higher prevalence of major comorbidities, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and peripheral vascular diseases. But, the ratios of fistula establishment and catheterization were similar between the elderly complicated with diabetes or peripheral vascular disease (50.7% vs 49.3%, P=0.217). The nutritional status (BMI, hemoglobin and albumin) were significantly worse in the elderly catheterization group (P=0.007, P=0.006, P=0.007). In the elderly groups, there were more fistula established in the elbow than the middle-aged group (8.3% vs 0.9%, P<0.001). The primary patency of fistula was less in the elderly than the middle-aged group (P=0.009), but the cumulative patency was similar between the 2 groups, though with higher rate of interventions (P=0.006). The prevalence of fistula maturation failure was obviously higher in the elderly (10.0% vs 3.5%, P=0.008). There were more patients undergoing tunneled cuffed catheterization in the elderly group (30.4% vs 0.0%, P<0.05). No significant difference was seen in the catheter patency between the 2 groups, but the elderly group had higher incidence of catheter-related infections (21.7% vs 15.3%, P=0.006). Conclusion Compared with the middle-aged MHD patients, the elderly ones have higher prevalence of catheterization and catheter-related infections, but similar patency of catheter. Though they have higher rate of fistula in the elbow, worse patency and fistula maturation, active interventions will obtain better outcomes as in the younger patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱蓓,梅竹,裴小华,袁海川,王蕾,朱思珠,赵卫红.维持性血液透析老年患者血管通路的特点[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2017,16(8):578~581

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-23
  • 最后修改日期:2017-05-03
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-08-25
  • 出版日期: