容量控制和压力控制通气模式在开腹手术老年患者中的比较
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 解放军总医院麻醉手术中心,北京 100853;2. 解放军总医院海南分院麻醉手术中心,三亚 572013)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

海南省卫计委普通科研项目(【2014】51-93);三亚市“十二五”科技项目(2014YW38)


Comparison of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled lung protective ventilation in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparotomy
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Anesthesia and Operation Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China;2. Anesthesia and Operation Center, Hainan Branch of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572013, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较压力控制(PCV)模式和容量控制(VCV)模式肺通气策略对老年全身麻醉腹部开放手术患者术中及术后的影响。方法 入选解放军总医院接受腹部开放手术的老年患者70例,男性39例,女性31例,年龄65~82岁。采用随机数字表法分为PCV组和VCV组,每组35例。记录插管前(T0)、插管机械通气3 min(T1)、手术开始后(T2)、手术2 h(T3)、手术结束(T4)和拔管后5 min(T5)时间点的心率(HR)、血压(BP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、气道峰压(Ppeak)、气道平均压(Pmean)、潮气量(VT)和呼吸频率(RR),并在T0、T1、T3和 T5时间点采取桡动脉血行血气分析,并记录患者住院期间并发症。结果 有8例患者被剔除,共62例患者纳入研究,PCV组30例,VCV组32例。PCV组患者T2、T3、T4时间点Ppeak显著低于VCV组(P<0.05)。手术开始后HR、MAP呈下降趋势,相比VCV组,PCV组患者T2、T3、T4时间点MAP较高,T4时间点最高,T3时间点乳酸水平较低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。相比T0时间点,T5 时间点两组患者pH、PaO2和氧合指数(OI)均明显下降(P<0.05)。PCV组和VCV组患者住院时间差异有统计学意义(18.3±5.3 vs 15.6±4.5,P=0.045)。PCV组患者术后2例(6.7%)转入重症监护病房(ICU),VCV组患者9例(28.1%)转入ICU,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 老年开腹手术患者利用PCV模式的保护性肺通气策略可在术中以更低的气道压水平获得相似的OI及PaO2,提示PCV模式保护性肺通气策略可更利于老年全身麻醉下的开腹手术患者。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effects of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) strategies for the patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparotomy. Methods A total of 70 patients (39 males and 31 females, aged from 65 to 82 years) who underwent general anesthesia for schedualed laparotomy were prospectively subjected in this clinical trial, and they were randomly assigned into PCV group (n=35) and VCV group (n=35). The hemodynamic and respiratory mechanic indices [including heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure (Pmean), tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate (RR)] were measured at the following time points, pre-intubation (T0), 3 min after intubation (T1), immediately after surgery began (T2), 2 h after surgery (T3), end of surgery (T4), and 5 min post-extubation (T5). The radial arterial blood gas analyses were tested at T0, T1, T3 and T5. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications during hospitalization were recorded. Results Eight patients were excluded and the other 62 patients were enrolled in this trial, including 30 patients for PCV group and 32 patients for VCV group. The level of Ppeak was significantly lower in the PCV group than in the VCV group at T2, T3 and T4 (P<0.05). From the beginning of operation, HR and MAP were in a trend of decreasing. Compared with the group VCV, the PCV group had comparatively higher MAP level at T2, T3 and T4, and reached the summit at T4, but the level of lactic acid was the lowest at T3 (P<0.05). The pH, PaO2 and oxygenation index (OI) values were obviously decreased in the both groups at T5 than at T0 (P<0.05). Significant difference was observed in the length of hospital stay in the PCV group and VCV group [(18.3±5.3) vs (15.6±4.5)d, P=0.045]. There were 2 of 30 patients (6.7%) in group PCV and 9 of 32 patients (28.1%) in group VCV admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), with significant difference between them (P<0.05).Conclusion PCV model as lung protective ventilation strategy can lead lower airway pressure and obtain similar OI and PaO2, and is beneficial to the aged patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparotomy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵亚杰,曹江北,彭鹏,陈岗,米卫东,徐龙河.容量控制和压力控制通气模式在开腹手术老年患者中的比较[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2017,16(4):265~269

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-16
  • 最后修改日期:2016-12-30
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-05-03
  • 出版日期: