老年冠心病患者服用替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷出血风险比较
作者:
作者单位:

(解放军总医院心血管内科,北京 100853)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R917; R592; R541.4

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(81270309)


Comparison of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in bleeding risk among the elderly with coronary artery disease
Author:
Affiliation:

(Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较≥70岁老年冠心病患者院外服用替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷时发生出血事件的风险。方法 本研究连续入选2014年1月至2015年3月期间在解放军总医院心血管内科因急性冠脉综合征(ACS)住院并行冠状动脉支架植入术的患者597例。根据选择的双联抗血小板方案分为两组:替格瑞洛组(同时服用替格瑞洛和阿司匹林,n=99)和氯吡格雷组(同时服用氯吡格雷和阿司匹林,n=498)。随访1年,比较两组患者的出血风险,并分析影响出血事件的危险因素。结果 替格瑞洛组患者出血事件的发生率显著高于氯吡格雷组(25.3% vs 14.5%),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.008),且两组患者的Ⅰ型出血事件发生率间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.015),而Ⅱ型出血事件发生率间差异无统计学意义(P=0.261)。用药期间共有263例患者行血栓弹力图(TEG)检测,其中替格瑞洛组77例和氯吡格雷组186例。与氯吡格雷组相比,替格瑞洛组患者的二磷酸腺苷(ADP)抑制率显著增加[(80.29±20.67)% vs(61.65±26.81)%,P<0.001]、ADP诱导的最大振幅(MAADP)显著降低[(25.28±14.28) vs(36.41±16.20)mm,P<0.001]。替格瑞洛组中MAADP<31 mm的患者(68.8% vs 40.3%,P<0.001)以及此类患者中发生出血事件者(24.5% vs 10.7%,P=0.037)均显著高于氯吡格雷组。多因素logistic回归分析表明,低体质量指数(BMI)(OR=0.910,95%CI:0.842~0.984,P=0.018)和高血压病(OR=1.301,95%CI:1.036~1.635,P=0.024)是≥70岁老年冠心病患者服用双联抗血小板药物期间发生出血事件的独立危险因素。结论 老年冠心病患者口服替格瑞洛的出血风险比氯吡格雷高,且低BMI与高血压病患者更易发生出血事件,因此选用双联抗血小板治疗方案时应充分考虑危险因素并行TEG监测,以减少出血事件的发生。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the bleeding risk in the over-70-year-old patients with coronary artery diseases treated by ticagrelor or clopidogrel after discharge from hospital. Methods Consecutive 597 elderly patients who were admitted to our department due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from Jan. 2014 to Mar. 2015 were enrolled in this study. According to their dual antiplatelet therapy, they were divided into ticagrelor group (n=99, treated with ticagrelor combined aspirin) and clopidogrel group (n=498, treated with clopidogrel combined aspirin). After 1 year’s follow-up, their bleeding risk was compared, and the risk factors of bleeding events were analyzed. Results The incidence of bleeding events was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group than the clopidogrel group (25.3% vs 14.5%, P=0.008), and significant difference was seen in the ratio of type Ⅰ bleeding events(P=0.015), but not in the type Ⅱ bleeding events (P=0.261) between the 2 groups. During the medication period, 263 patients underwent thrombelastography (TEG), including 77 cases from the former and 186 from the latter group. ADP-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation was significantly increased [(80.29±20.67)% vs (61.65±26.81)%, P<0.001], but ADP-induced maximum amplitude (MAADP) was significantly reduced [(25.28±14.28) vs (36.41±16.20) mm, P<0.001] in the ticagrelor group than the clopidogrel group. The ticagrelor group had significantly larger percentage of patients with MAADP <31 mm than the clopidogrel group (68.8% vs 40.3%, P<0.001), and these patients had obviously higher occurrence of bleeding events as well (24.5% vs 10.7%,P=0.037).Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that low body mass index (BMI;OR=0.910,5%CI:0.842-0.984,P=0.018) and being complicated with hypertension (OR=1.301,5%CI:1.036-1.635,P=0.024) were the independent risk factors of bleeding events in the ≥70-year-old patients with coronary artery disease in treatment of dual antiplatelet therapy. Conclusion The risk of bleeding events is higher when taking ticagrelor than clopidogrel in the elderly patients with coronary artery disease. And those with low BMI and hypertension are prone to bleeding events. Therefore, full consideration should be given to the risk factors of bleeding, and TEG monitoring should be carried out in the treatment of dual antiplatelet therapy in order to reduce the incidence of bleeding events.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

程庆强,高洁,吕中华,耿晓雯,任艺虹.老年冠心病患者服用替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷出血风险比较[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2016,15(12):881~885

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-14
  • 最后修改日期:2016-08-08
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-01-01
  • 出版日期: