替罗非班对老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期应用的安全性研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

全军医学科技“十二五”科研项目(CWS12J122); 解放军总医院临床科研扶持基金(2012FC-ZHCB-3003)


Safety of tirofiban in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes in perioperative period of percutaneous coronary intervention
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)围手术期联合应用替罗非班抗血小板治疗,对不同年龄急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的有效性及安全性。方法 回顾性地收集解放军总医院老年心内科2011年1月至2012年12月确诊为ACS,围术期均用小剂量替罗非班,并植入药物洗脱支架(DES)的患者302例(男性207例,女性95例),根据年龄分为老年组(≥65岁,n=155)和中青年组(<65岁,n=147)。比较两组患者PCI术后30d内主要及次要终点事件的发生率,并用多因素logistic回归分析终点事件发生的相关危险因素。结果 (1)老年组主要终点事件发生率明显高于中青年组[26(16.7%) vs 7(4.8%),P=0.001]。(2)30d随访期间两组患者均未出现颅内出血,消化道出血两组各1例,老年组发生轻微出血事件24例(15.5%),中青年组6例(4.2%),P=0.001。(3)多因素logistic回归分析表明,年龄≥65岁、女性、吸烟史、糖尿病、高脂血症、既往PCI史为30d内主要终点事件发生的独立危险因素。(4)女性、吸烟史、糖尿病与30d内各种出血事件成正相关,老龄、高脂血症、既往PCI史不是出血并发症发生的预测因素。结论 围术期应用替罗非班强化抗血小板治疗,老年组患者主要终点事件及轻微出血事件的发生率均高于中青年组,提示对老年患者介入治疗过程中强化抗血小板治疗需慎重。

    Abstract:

    Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of combined application of tirofiban with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients at different ages in perioperative period. Methods A retrospective study was carried out for consecutive ACS patients receiving low-dose tirofiban in perioperative period and undergoing PCI and drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation in our department from Jan. 2011 to Dec. 2012. A total of 302 patients (207 males and 95 females) were recruited in this study, and were divided into 2 groups according to their ages: the elderly group (≥65 years, n=155) and the young and middle aged group(age<65 years, n=147). The incidences of primary and secondary end points of a major cardiovascular event were compared between the 2 groups within 30 d after the PCI. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for the endpoints. Results (1) Among the 302 patients, the incidence of primary end points was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the young and middle aged group [26(16.7%) vs 7(4.8%), P=0.001]. (2) No serious acute intracranial bleeding occurred in the 2 groups. Each group had 1 case of gastrointestinal bleeding [1(0.7%) vs 1(0.6%), P=1.000]. While, there were 24 patients (15.5%) having minimal bleeding events from the elderly group and 6 patients (4.2%) from the young and middle aged group (P=0. 001). (3) Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that aged over 65 years, female, history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and prior history of PCI were the independent risk factors of the primary end points in both groups during the 30-day follow-up. (4) Female, history of smoking, and diabetes mellitus were positively correlated with bleeding complications, while aging, hyperlipidemia, and prior history of PCI were not the independent predictive factors of bleeding events. Conclusion Combined application of tirofiban in perioperative period of PCI results in significant increases in the incidences of primary end points and minimal bleeding events in the elderly than in the young and middle aged patients, which suggests that the antiplatelet medication of tirofiban should be prudently conducted for the elderly.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

凡永艳,李 泱,彭 利,郭文杰,张 彦,卢才义*,薛 桥*.替罗非班对老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期应用的安全性研究[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2014,13(10):732~737

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-10-31
  • 出版日期: