丁苯酞注射液治疗急性脑梗死的初步探讨
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

陕西省重点科技创新团队(2012KCT-17)


Primary efficacy of DL-3-n-butylphthalide in treatment of acute cerebral infarction
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价丁苯酞(NBP)注射液对急性脑梗死的疗效及药物不良反应。方法 选择2012年9月至2013年11月陕西省人民医院70例急性脑梗死住院患者,随机分为治疗组(n=35)和对照组(n=35),对照组仅予常规治疗,治疗组在常规治疗的基础上给予NBP注射液治疗。于治疗前及治疗后14d进行神经功能缺损程度评定美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)和日常生活自理能力评定[Barthel指数(BI)和改良Rankin量表(mRS)]并记录不良反应。90d随访时再次评定BI和mRS。结果 与治疗前相比,治疗后14d两组NIHSS均下降,治疗组优于对照组[治疗组(13.60±4.26) vs (9.31±3.79),对照组(13.57±4.20) vs (11.23±4.06),P=0.045]。与治疗前相比,治疗后14d两组BI差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);随访90d时两组BI均明显升高,且治疗组优于对照组[治疗组(54.57±24.17) vs (77.86±21.46),对照组(54.14±23.81) vs (67.0±23.30),P=0.047]。与治疗前相比,治疗后14d两组mRS变化不明显(P>0.05);治疗后90d,治疗组mRS较治疗前明显减低,且治疗组优于对照组[治疗组(3.40±0.81) vs (2.80±0.96),对照组(3.49±0.82) vs (3.29±0.93),P=0.035 ]。两组不良反应发生率相似。结论 NBP注射液可改善急性脑梗死所致的神经功能缺损,改善90d远期预后,安全性良好。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of DL-3-n-butylphthalide (NBP) injection on acute cerebral infarction and its adverse reactions. Methods Seventy patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted in our hospital from September 2012 to November 2013 were randomly divided into standard treatment plus NBP (n=35) and standard treatment (control, n=35) groups. Before and in 14d after the treatment, the degree of neurological deficit was evaluated by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), daily living skills assessment were assessed by Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Score (mRS), and adverse reactions were recorded. BI and mRS were also followed up in 90d after the treatment. Results In 14d after treatment, NIHSS were decreased in both NBP and control groups compared with pretreatment. The decrease in NIHSS was more significant in NBP group than in control group [NBP group: (13.60±4.26) vs (9.31±3.79); control group: (13.57±4.20) vs (11.23±4.06); P=0.045]. No obvious change of BI was found in both 2 groups in 14 d after treatment. The BI at the follow-up of 90 d was significantly higher in NBP group than in control group [(NBP group: (54.57±24.17) vs (77.86±21.46); control group: (54.14±23.81) vs (67.0±23.30); P=0.047)]. There was no significant change in mRS in both 2 groups after treatment for 14d. In 90d after the treatment, the decrease in mRS was more significant in NBP group than in control group [NBP group: (3.40±0.81) vs (2.80±0.96); control group: (3.49±0.82) vs (3.29±0.93); P=0.035]. The incidence of adverse reactions was identical between the 2 groups. Conclusion NBP injection obviously improves neurological deficit resulting from acute cerebral infarction, and also improves 90-day outcome with sound safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

唐 鹏,刘 玥,刘 鹏,种 莉,李晓青,陈 丽,郭民侠,李 锐*.丁苯酞注射液治疗急性脑梗死的初步探讨[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2014,13(08):583~586

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-08-22
  • 出版日期: