胰岛素抗体阳性和阴性的2型糖尿病患者血糖波动水平比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

四川省科技厅科技支撑项目(2011SZ0220)


The difference of blood glucose fluctuation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with positive and negative insulin autoantibodies
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨胰岛素自身抗体(IAA)阳性和阴性的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖波动情况, 分析影响IAA产生的有关因素。方法 连续纳入2009年5月至2012年3月华西医院内分泌科住院的T2DM患者62例, 所有患者均应用动态血糖监测系统进行72 h血糖监测, 并检测糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)、IAA、血脂、肝肾功能。根据IAA检查结果, 将患者分为抗体阳性组(31例)和抗体阴性组(31例)。记录两组受试者的空腹血糖、血糖水平的标准差、早餐后血糖波动、午餐后血糖波动(PPGEAL)、晚餐后血糖波动、平均餐后血糖波动(MPPGE)、平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE), 最大血糖波动幅度(LAGE)、日间血糖平均绝对差。并通过患者的年龄、性别、治疗方式、体质量指数、高血压病史及高血脂病史预测胰岛素抗体产生的相关性, 采用多元逐步回归方法建立上述指标的多元logistic回归方程。结果 抗体阳性组患者的平均血糖标准差, MAGE, LAGE, PPGEAL均大于抗体阴性组, 差异有统计学意义(P值分别为0.031, 0.010, 0.021, 0.030); 但两组患者的其他指标均没有统计学意义(P>0.05); 多元logistic逐步回归分析显示, 治疗方式与IAA产生的风险性有关。结论 IAA阳性较IAA阴性T2DM患者的日内血糖波动幅度更大, 两组日间血糖波动幅度无明显差异。使用外源性胰岛素治疗与胰岛素抗体的产生具相关性, 使用胰岛素注射治疗的患者产生胰岛素抗体的风险性是口服降糖药治疗患者的5.525倍。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the difference of blood glucose fluctuation between type 2 diabetic patients with positive and negative insulin autoantibodies (IAA), and to analyze risk factors which would influence the productions of IAA. Methods Sixty-two hospitalized patients receiving IAA assay and glycemic excursions monitoring with continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital from May 2009 to March 2012 were recruited. IAA was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). According to the results of IAA assay, the patients were divided into IAA positive group (n=31) and IAA negative group (n=31). The glucose excursions were assessed by the following parameters obtained from CGMS for 72h: the mean blood glucose (MBG) and its standard deviation (SD), the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), the mean of daily differences (MODD), the postprandial amplitude of glycemic excursion after breakfast (PPGEAB), the postprandial amplitude of glycemic excursion after lunch (PPGEAL), the postprandial amplitude of glycemic excursion after supper (PPGEAS), the mean amplitude of postprandial blood glycemic excursion (MPPGE), the large amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE). Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in two groups were also determined. Difference of glucose excursion between two groups was evaluated. The relation of age, sex, choice of therapy, body mass index(BMI) and histories of hypertension and hyperlipidemia with the production of IAA were also evaluated, and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze risk factors influencing the productions of IAA. Results LN(SD), MAGE, LAGE, PPGEAL in IAA positive patients were statistically significantly higher than those in IAA negative patients(P=0.031, P=0.010, P=0.021, and P=0.030; respectively). Multiple stepwise regression showed that choice of treatment was related to the production of IAA. Conclusion The inner daily glucose excursions was larger in patients with IAA positive than IAA negative, and no difference was found in inter daily excursions. Usage of exogenous insulin was positively related to the production of IAA, and the risk was 5.525 times in patients using subcutaneous insulin therapy than patients taking oral hypoglycemic agents.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

何 华, 杨晓洁, 吕霞飞, 王 椿, 陈大伟, 李秀钧, 冉兴无.胰岛素抗体阳性和阴性的2型糖尿病患者血糖波动水平比较[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2012,11(9):645~648

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: