配对血浆滤过吸附治疗脓毒症合并多器官功能障碍综合征的临床研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Coupled plasma filtration absorption for sepsis patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndromes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的比较高容量血液滤过(HVHF)与配对血浆滤过吸附(CPFA)治疗脓毒症并多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)及老年多器官功能衰竭(multiple organ failure in the elderly,MOFE)的临床疗效。方法选择脓毒症并MODS的患者14例,随机分为HVHF治疗组及CPFA治疗组,在常规治疗基础上分别予HVHF或CPFA治疗10 h,观察两种方式治疗前后的血流动力学、电解质及酸碱平衡、急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(acute physiologyand chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)及序贯器官衰竭估计评分(SOFA)、短期存活率等变化。结果 (1)两种治疗均能降低血尿素氮、肌酐水平,维持电解质、酸碱平衡,对白细胞、血小板、血细胞比容无明显影响。(2)CPFA治疗后氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)明显改善(P<0.05)、平均动脉压(MAP)明显升高(P<0.05)、SOFA评分及APACHEⅡ评分均明显下降(P<0.05);而HVHF治疗后仅见SOFA评分明显下降(P<0.05),PaO2/FiO2、MAP、及APACHEⅡ评分均无明显改变(P>0.05)。(3)两种方法治疗过程中均未出现出血、栓塞、过敏等并发症,老年患者耐受性好。(4)治疗7 d后HVHF组4例存活,CPFA组6例存活。结论 HVHF和CPFA治疗对脓毒症合并MODS及MOFE患者均有一定临床疗效,且后者更具优势。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of high volume hemofiltration(HVHF) and coupled plasma filtration absorption(CPFA) on sepsis patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndromes(MODS) or multiple organ failure in the elderly(MOFE).Methods Fourteen sepsis patients complicated with MODS were enrolled and randomly divided into HVHF and CPFA groups.The two groups respectively received 10 h of HVHF or CPFA treatment.The primary endpoints were changes in hemodynamic effects,electrolytes and acid-base balance,sepsis-related organ failure assessment(SOFA) score and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ) score after pulse HVHF or CPFA.Results(1) After the therapies,blood urea nitrogen(BUN) and serum creatinine(Cr) all significantly decreased,electrolytes and acid-base balance were well maintained,and no visible influence was found in white blood cell count,platelet or hematocrit.(2) After CPFA,SOFA score and APACHEⅡscore decreased dramatically(P<0.05),mean arterial pressure(MAP) and oxygenation index(PaO2/FiO2) showed significant improvement(P<0.05).However,after HVHF,only SOFA score was markedly decreased(P<0.05),no significant differences were found in MAP,oxygenation index or APACHEⅡ score(P>0.05).(3) No therapy related adverse reactions such as hemorrhage,hypersensitiveness or embolism were noted even in the aged during the two treatments.(4) Seven days after therapies,4 patients survived in the HVHF group and 6 survived in the CPFA group.Conclusion Both HVHF and CPFA therapies improve the clinical manifestations of sepsis patients with MODS,and the effect of CPFA is superior to HVHF.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡大兰,赵卫红.配对血浆滤过吸附治疗脓毒症合并多器官功能障碍综合征的临床研究[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2010,9(5):428~431+435

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: