老年鼻咽癌癌组织中Kruppel样因子5及Kruppel样因子9表达与患者复发的相关性
作者:
作者单位:

(1.湖南省脑科医院 病理科,长沙 410007;2.湖南省脑科医院 检验科,长沙 410007)


Correlation of expression of Kruppel-like factor 5 and Kruppel-like factor 9 in cancer tissues with recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in elderly patients
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Department of Pathology, Changsha 410007, China;2.Clinical Laboratory, Hunan Provincial Brain Hospital, Changsha 410007, China)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论

    【摘要】目的 探讨老年鼻咽癌癌组织中Kruppel样因子5(KLF5)、Kruppel样因子9(KLF9)表达与患者复发间的关系。方法 回顾性分析2016年5月至2018年5月湖南省脑科医院收治的263例老年鼻咽癌患者的临床资料,患者治疗后均行5年院外随访,观察患者是否出现复发。通过Western blotting技术检测老年鼻咽癌患者癌组织中KLF5、KLF9相对蛋白表达量,比较复发患者与非复发患者的基础资料信息[性别、年龄、国际抗癌联盟(UICC)分期、病理类型、疗程延长时间、放疗剂量、是否放疗联合化疗、是否鼻腔受侵、是否口咽受侵、是否颅底骨质受侵、是否颅内受损、是否颅神经损伤]及KLF5、KLF9差异。通过多因素logistic逐步回归分析老年鼻咽癌患者复发的危险因素。采用SPSS 22.0软件进行数据分析。根据数据类型,组间比较分别采用t检验及χ2检验。结果 263例老年鼻咽癌患者治疗结束后行5年院外随访,复发患者共27例(10.27%)。与非复发组患者相比,复发组患者UICC分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期、未行放疗联合化疗、颅底骨质受侵、颅神经损伤占比较高,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。与非复发组患者相比,复发组患者KLF5、KLF9相对蛋白表达量下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对KLF5、KLF9进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,其对老年鼻咽癌患者复发有较好的预测价值,且联合预测价值更高,曲线下面积分别为0.800、0.790、0.894,且均有P<0.05。多因素logistic回归分析显示,UICC分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期(OR=3.420,95%CI 1.715~6.820)、未行放疗联合化疗(OR=1.434,95%CI 1.106~1.859)、颅底骨质受侵(OR=2.790,95%CI 1.337~5.822)、颅神经损伤(OR=1.249,95%CI 1.026~1.520)、KLF5<2.495(OR=4.453,95%CI 1.469~13.498)、KLF9<0.305(OR=2.719,95%CI 1.604~4.609)是老年鼻咽癌患者复发的危险因素。结论 老年鼻咽癌患者癌组织内KLF5、KLF9表达下降,且KLF5、KLF9表达为患者复发的影响因素。

    基金项目:湖南省自然科学基金科卫联合项目(2021JJ70012)

    【Abstract】Objective To investigate the relationship of the expressions of Kruppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) and Kruppel-like factor 9 (KLF9) with the recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the elderly patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was made of the clinical data of 263 elderly NPC patients admitted to Hunan Provincial Brain Hospital from May 2016 to May 2018. All patients were followed up for 5 years after treatment to observe for recurrence. Protein expression levels of KLF5 and KLF9 in the cancer tissues of the patients were detected using Western blotting technique. The recurrent and non-recurrent patients were compared for the basic data [gender, age, union for international cancer control (UICC) stage, pathological type, duration of extended treatment, radiotherapy dose, radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy, nasal invasion, oropharyngeal invasion, skull base bone invasion, intracranial damage, cranial nerve injury] and KLF5 and KLF9. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of recurrence in the elderly NPC patients . SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis. Comparison between two groups was performed using t test or χ2 test depending on the data type. Results A total of 263 elderly NPC patients were followed up for 5 years after treatment, and 27 (10.27%) experienced relapse. Compared with the non-recurrent patients, the recurrent patients had higher proportions of those with UICC stage Ⅲ to Ⅳ, those without radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy, those with skull base bone invasion, and those with cranial nerve injury, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Compared with non-relapse patients, the expression of KLF5 and KLF9 in the relapse patients decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of KLF5 and KLF9 showed better predictive value for the NPC recurrence in the elderly patients, and the combined predictive value was higher, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.800,0.790 and 0.894, respectively (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that UICC stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ (OR=3.420,95%CI 1.715-6.820), no radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy (OR=1.434,95%CI 1.106-1.859), skull base bone invasion (OR=2.790,95%CI 1.337-5.822), cranial nerve injury (OR=1.249,95%CI 1.026-1.520), KLF5 < 2.495 (OR=4.453,95%CI 1.469-13.498), KLF9<0.305 (OR=2.719,95%CI 1.604-4.609) were risk factors for NPC recurrence in the elderly patients. Conclusion The expressions of KLF5 and KLF9 in the cancer tissues of the elderly NPC patients decrease and are factors affecting the recurrence.

    This work was supported by Joint Project of the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation and the Department of Science and Technology of Health (2021JJ70012)

    参考文献
    [1] 周勇, 陈浩, 窦前,等.基于5种EB病毒抗体评估广州地区人群患鼻咽癌的危险度[J].实用医学杂志, 2023,39(5):602-606.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.05.013.
    [2] 姚鑫森, 尹勇, 巩贯忠,等.基于形变配准分析18例鼻咽癌放疗中肿瘤靶区和危及器官剂量变化[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2020,27(1):53-58.DOI:10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2020.01.08.
    [3] Tang LL, Guo R, Zhang N, et al.Effect of radiotherapy alone vs radiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy on survival without disease relapse in patients with low-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA, 2022,328(8):728-736.DOI:10.1001/jama.2022.13997.
    [4] Jiang YY, Jiang Y, Li CQ, et al.TP63, SOX2, and KLF5 establish a core regulatory circuitry that controls epigenetic and transcription patterns in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines[J].Gastroenterology, 2020,159(4):1311-1327.DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.050.
    [5] Viola L, Londero AP, Bertozzi S, et al.Prognostic role of krüppel-like factors 5,9, and 11 in endometrial endometrioid cancer[J].Pathol Oncol Res, 2020,26(4):2265-2272.DOI:10.1007/s12253-020-00817-z.
    [6] 马玲, 李海明, 翟展艺,等.检测miR-141和KLF9在非小细胞肺癌中的表达水平及对细胞的增殖和侵袭的影响[J].临床肺科杂志, 2021,26(5):762-766.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2021.05.025.
    [7] 赵影颖, 吴晴伟.KLF5和ITGA3在喉癌组织中的表达水平及其与患者预后的关系[J].热带医学杂志, 2019,19(4):467-471.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3619.2019.04.019.
    [8] Chang ET, Ye W, Zeng YX, et al.The evolving epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2021,30(6):1035-1047.DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1702.
    [9] 吴晓峰.无远处转移鼻咽癌患者治疗后局部复发的回顾性研究[J].肿瘤学杂志, 2018,24(6):551-554.DOI:10.11735/j.issn.1671-170X.2018.06.B005.
    [10] 林灿峰, 李东升, 林柏翰,等.鼻咽癌治疗后局部复发回顾性研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2017,24(3):189-191.DOI:CNKI:SUN:QLZL.0.2017-03-009.
    [11] 王志强, 贺璇, 李思维,等.Yes相关蛋白、哺乳动物不育系20样激酶1、细胞周期蛋白D1在鼻咽癌中的表达及临床意义[J].中国现代医学杂志, 2019,29(9):39-43.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2019.09.008.
    [12] 孟聪聪, 张艳凯, 于利利,等.甲状腺乳头癌组织中KLF5,TAZ,UHRF1的表达水平及其临床意义[J].实用癌症杂志, 2023,38(5):771-774.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2023.05.019.
    [13] 孙振层, 王睿, 刁玉荣.miR-143-3p和KLF5在前列腺癌中的表达关系及意义[J].武警后勤学院学报(医学版), 2021,30(8):7-11.
    [14] 蔡卫梅, 李伟伟, 陆志红,等.癌组织中KLF9、TFAP4基因表达在非小细胞肺癌患者预后中的应用价值[J].广东医学, 2021,42(2):157-161.DOI:10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20200471.
    [15] 易亭伍, 梁睿, 宿向东.长链非编码RNA SNHG15通过miR-141-3p/KLF9机制调控鼻咽癌细胞增殖的实验研究[J].陕西医学杂志, 2021,50(1):10-14.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.01.003.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

徐敏,周金,范冶,徐飞.老年鼻咽癌癌组织中Kruppel样因子5及Kruppel样因子9表达与患者复发的相关性[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2024,23(4):262-266

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:101
  • 下载次数: 250
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-29
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-23
文章二维码