左心室心肌做功预测心脏再同步化治疗的效果
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 大连医科大学研究生院影像医学与核医学系,辽宁 大连 116044;2.苏北人民医院 功能检查科,江苏 扬州225001;3. 苏北人民医院心血管内科,江苏 扬州225001)


Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy by global left ventricular myocardial work
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Faculty of Medical Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, Liaoning Province, China;2. Department of Echocardiography,Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China;3. Department of Cardiology, Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论

    【摘要】目的 利用二维斑点追踪成像(2D-STI)技术新参数左心室心肌做功预测心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)的效果。方法 选取2017年12月至2019年10月在苏北人民医院接受CRT治疗的75例心力衰竭患者为研究对象,于CRT术前及术后6个月测量常规超声心动图参数以及利用2D-STI技术分析整体心肌做功参数。将术后左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)缩小≥15%定义为 CRT 治疗有效。采用SPSS 25.0软件进行统计分析,变量间相关性采用Spearman相关性分析。应用ROC曲线分析各参数预测CRT的效果。 结果 CRT的有效率为65%(49/75)。与术前比较,有效组术后左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)和LVESV减小,左心室射血分数(LVEF)增高,有效组术后心肌做功指数(GWI)、整体有效功(GCW)、整体做功效率(GWE)增高,整体无效功(GWW)降低(P<0.05);无效组各参数比较差异均无统计学意义。有效组术前GCW和GWW大于无效组(P<0.05) 。GCW与左心室收缩末期容积减少率(△LVESV)及LVEF呈线性相关(r=0.58,0.64;均 P<0.05);GCW、GWW预测CRT疗效的ROC曲线下面积为0.78与0.85。 结论 左心室心肌做功参数可评估CRT患者左心室收缩功能,并可预测CRT患者的治疗效果。

    基金项目:扬州市科技计划重点研发计划-社会发展项目(YZ2016075)

    【Abstract】Objective To evaluate left ventricular myocardial work (LVMW) in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using innovative two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI) technology. Methods From December 2017 to October 2019,75 patients with heart failure received CRT in Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital were selected. Conventional echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CRT, and global LVMW index (LVMWI) was analyzed with 2D-STI. Patients were defined as responders if a reduction over 15% was observed in left ventricular end-systolic volume(LVESV) after CRT. SPSS statistics 25.0 was used for statistical analysis, and the correlation between variables was analyzed using Spearman correlation. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to analyze the predictive value of different parameters for the therapeutic effects of CRT. Results The effective rate of CRT was 65%(49/75). Compared with before operation, the responders had lower left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LVESV, higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), higher myocardial work index (GWI), higher global effective work (GCW), higher global work efficiency (GWE), and lower overall invalid work (GWW) after the intervention (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in those parameters in the non-responders. Preoperative GCW and GWW were higher in the responders than the non-responders (P<0.05). GCW was linearly correlated with △LVESV and LVEF (r=0.58,0.64; P<0.05 for both). The area under the ROC curve was 0.78 for GCW and 0.85 for GWW in predicting CRT responders (P<0.05). Conclusion The left ventricular myocardial work index can evaluate the left ventricular systolic function in the CRT patients and can be used to predict the response to CRT.

    This work was supported by the Primary Research & Social Developement Plan of Yangzhou(YZ2016075).

    参考文献
    [1] Anand IS, Carson P, Galle E, et al.Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the risk of hospitalizations in patients with advanced heart failure:results from the Comparison of Medical Therapy,Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial[J].Circulation, 2009,119(7):969-977.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.793273.
    [2] 齐书英,王冬梅,张徽,等.心脏再同步化治疗对心力衰竭患者左房结构及功能的影响[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志, 2016,30(5):429-431.DOI:10.13333/j.cnki.cjcpe.2016.05.014.Qi SY, Wang DM, Zhang H, et al.The effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the structure and function of left atrial in patients with congestive heart failure[J].Chin J Card Pacing Electrophysiol,2016,30(5):429-431.DOI:10.13333/j.cnki.cjcpe.2016.05.014.
    [3] Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, et al.Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial[J].Circulation, 2008,117 (20):2608-2616.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743120.
    [4] 舒先红,潘翠珍,潘文志,等.常用超声指标不能预测心脏再同步化治疗的疗效[J].中华超声影像学杂志, 2009,18(11):938-941.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2009.11.007.Shu XH, Pan CZ, Pan WZ, et al.M-mode echocardiography, pulsed-wave Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging failed to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy responders[J].Chin J Ultrasonogr, 2009,18(11):938-941.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2009.11.007.
    [5] Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L, et al.A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure-strain loop area: a non-invasive index of myocardial work[J].Eur Heart J, 2012,33(6):724-733.DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs016.
    [6] van der Bijl P, Kostyukevich M, El Mahdiui M, et al.A roadmap to assess myocardial work:from theory to clinical practice[J].JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019,12(12):2549-2554.DOI:10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.05.028.
    [7] Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L, et al.Assessment of wasted myocardial work:a novel method to quantify energy loss due to uncoordinated left ventricular contractions[J].Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2013,305(7):H996-1003.DOI:10.1152/ajpheart.00191.2013.
    [8] Hubert A, Le Rolle V, Leclercq C, et al.Estimation of myocardial work from pressure-strain loops analysis:an experimental evaluation[J].Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018,19(12):1372-1379.DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jey024.
    [9] 江佩,张平洋,马小五,等.左心室心肌力学参数预测心脏再同步化治疗效果的临床研究[J].临床医学, 2017,37(8):1-4.DOI:10.19528/j.issn.1003-3548.2017.08.001.Jiang P, Zhang PY, Ma XW, et al.Prediction on effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy by mechanical parameters of left ventri-cular myocardium[J].Clin Med,2017,37(8):1-4.DOI:10.19528/j.issn.1003-3548.2017.08.001.
    [10] El Mahdiui M, van der Bijl P, Abou R, et al.Global left ventri-cular myocardial work efficiency in healthy individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2019,32(9):1120-1127.DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2019.05.002.
    [11] 巩雪, 宿燕岗, 潘文志,等.常用临床和超声指标对心脏再同步化治疗效果的预测价值[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(2):368-372.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2011.02.010.Gong X, Su YG, Pan WZ, et al.Predictive value of clinical and echo-cardiographic parameters on cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Chin J Clinicians(Electron Ed), 2011,5(2):368-372.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2011.02.010.
    [12] 陈勇, 马勇, 居燕, 等.超声心动图引导下心脏再同步化治疗的优化调节[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2012,11(12):926-929.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1264.2012.00237.Chen Y, Ma Y, Ju Y, et al.Optimization of cardiac resynchronization guided by echocardiography[J].Chin J Mult Organ Dis Elderly, 2012,11(12):926-929.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1264.2012.00237.
    [13] Delgado V, van Bommel RJ, Bertini M, et al.Relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony, left ventricular lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term survival of ischemic heart fai-lure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Circulation, 2011,123(1):70-78.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.945345.
    [14] Reant P, Zaroui A, Donal E, et al.Identification and characterization of super-responders after cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Am J Cardiol, 2010,105(9):1327-1335.DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.058.
    [15] Galli E, Leclercq C, Hubert A, et al.Role of myocardial constructive work in the identification of responders to CRT[J].Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018,19(9):1010-1018.DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jex191.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

曹司琪,陈勇,李红校,杨菲,陈银花,崔瑞雪.左心室心肌做功预测心脏再同步化治疗的效果[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2021,20(3):191-196

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-03-29
文章二维码