高敏肌钙蛋白T对非急性冠脉综合征老年住院衰弱患者预后的影响
作者:
作者单位:

(首都医科大学附属复兴医院综合老年科,北京100038)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R592

基金项目:

首都医学发展科研基金(2016-2-7012);首都医科大学附属复兴医院科研培育基金(PY-Q-202205)


Influence of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T on prognosis of frail elderly inpatients
Author:
Affiliation:

(Department of Geriatrics, Fuxing Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨高敏肌钙蛋白T(hs-cTnT)对非急性冠脉综合征(ACS)老年住院衰弱及衰弱前期患者预后的影响。方法 选择2017年1月至2019年12月于首都医科大学附属复兴医院综合老年科收住院的经Fried量表评估为衰弱及衰弱前期患者。检测患者的hs-cTnT水平,记录患者的一般资料、实验室检查指标及超声心动指标,出院后每3个月进行电话随访,记录患者的全因死亡情况。根据hs-cTnT三分位数将患者分为低值组、中值组和高值组,采用乘积极限(Kaplan-Meier)法(K-M曲线)比较3组患者生存曲线的差异,采用Cox回归模型分析hs-cTnT三分位分组对患者死亡风险的影响。采用SPSS 18.0软件进行数据分析。根据数据类型,组间比较分别采用t检验、方差分析、Wilcoxon检验及χ2检验。结果 本研究共纳入衰弱及衰弱前期老年住院患者450例,其中72.4%(326/450)患者hs-cTnT超过切点值0.014μg/L。低值组、中值组和高值组年龄[(83.67±5.72)和(86.06±4.93)和(87.67±5.23)岁]、男性患者[62(41.3%)和94(62.7%)和108(72.0%)]、慢性心力衰竭患者[(4(2.7%)和5(3.3%)和22(14.7%)]、高血压患者[(116(77.3%)和119(79.3%)和133(88.7%)]、心律失常患者[41(27.3%)和38(25.3%)和60(40.0%)]、慢性肾脏病患者[27(18.0%)和38(25.3%)和61(40.7%)]、共病(≥4种共病)患者[72(48.0%)和73(48.7%)和99(66.0%)]、血红蛋白[(125.11±16.03)和(121.50±18.08)和(115.38±16.97)g/L]、肾小球滤过率[(87.91±30.74)和(76.73±23.08)和(66.69±27.80)ml/(min·1.73m2)]、白蛋白[(38.15±3.81)和(37.60±3.98)和(36.04±4.41)g/L]、总胆固醇[(4.01±0.98)和(3.62±0.88)和(3.70±0.85)mmol/L]、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇[(2.42±0.88)和(2.05±0.73)和(2.19±0.77)mmol/L]、N末端B型钠利尿肽前体[163.5(104.8,398.9)和314.7(171.4,683.8)和547.3(288.3,1568.3)pg/ml]、室间隔厚度[(11.30±0.83)和(11.42±0.79)和(11.71±1.07)mm]、左室后壁厚度[(11.31±0.83)和(11.46±0.75)和(11.65±0.83)mm]、左室质量指数[(107.38±13.32)和(109.90±13.86)和(112.72±19.29)g/m2]及左室射血分数[(60.65%±2.97%)和(59.58%±3.91%)和(58.54%±5.08%)]比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。Cox回归模型分析显示,校正性别、年龄、合并疾病、化验指标及超声心动指标后,高值组患者死亡风险较低值组明显增高(HR=3.133, 95%CI 1.381~7.109;P<0.01);生存曲线显示,低值组、中值组和高值组中位生存时间估计值分别为53、51和48个月,在出院后10~20个月后高值组生存率明显低于低值组和中值组;在出院后20~30个月后,高值组、中值组患者生存率明显低于低值组,生存曲线Log-Rank检验显示生存率差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论 本研究结果显示,无ACS老年衰弱及衰弱前期住院患者,hs-cTnT水平高,高于切点值的比例高,hs-TnT高值组患者死亡风险明显增加,不同水平hs-cTnT升高均会对患者全因死亡产生不良影响,hs-TnT水平越高对死亡风险的影响越明显。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the influence of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) on the prognosis of frail and pre-frail elderly hospitalized patients without acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods The elderly patients who were admitted to our department and identified as frailty or pre-frailty by Fried Frailty Phenotype assessment from January 2017 to December 2019 were enrolled in this study. Their hs-cTnT level, general information, laboratory indicators and echocardiographic indicators were recorded. Follow-up was conducted each three months through phone call after discharge and all-cause deaths of the patients were observed. These patients were divided into low-, median-, and high-value groups according to hs-cTnT tertiles. The survival curves of the three groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier method (K-M curve). Cox proportional hazard-regression model was used to analyze the effect of 3 hs-cTnT groups on the risk of death. SPSS statistics 18.0 was used for statistical analysis. Data comparison between two groups was perfomed using t test, Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon test or χ2 test depending on data type. Results A total of 450 frail and pre-frail elderly inpatients were subjected in this study, 72.4% (326/450) of them had hs-cTnT levels exceeding the cut-off value of 0.014 μg/L. There were significant differences in age [(83.67±5.72)vs (86.06±4.93) vs (87.67±5.23)years], male ratio [62 (41.3%) vs 94 (62.7%) vs 108 (72.0%)], chronic heart failure ratio [4 (2.7%) vs 5 (3.3%) vs 22 (14.7%)], hypertension ratio [116 (77.3%) vs 119 (79.3%) vs 133 (88.7%)], arrhythmia ratio [41 (27.3%) vs 38 (25.3%) vs 60 (40.0%)], chronic kidney disease ratio [27 (18.0%) vs 38 (25.3%) vs 61 (40.7%)], comorbid conditions [≥4,72 (48.0%) vs 73 (48.7%) vs 99 (66.0%)], hemoglobin level [(125.11±16.03)vs (121.50±18.08) vs (115.38±16.97)g/L], estimated glomerular filtration rate [(87.91±30.74)vs (76.73±23.08) vs (66.69±27.80)ml/(min·1.73m2)], albumin level [(38.15±3.81)vs (37.60±3.98) vs (36.04±4.41)g/L], total cholesterol level [(4.01±0.98)vs (3.62±0.88) vs (3.70±0.85) mmol/L], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level [(2.42±0.88)vs (2.05±0.73) vs (2.19±0.77)mmol/L], N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level [163.5 (104.8,398.9) vs 314.7 (171.4,683.8) vs  547.3 (288.3,1568.3) pg/ml], interventricular septal thickness [(11.30±0.83)vs (11.42±0.79) vs (11.71±1.07)mm], left ventricular post-wall depth [(11.31±0.83)vs (11.46±0.75) vs (11.65±0.83)mm], left ventricular mass index [(107.38±13.32)vs (109.90±13.86) vs (112.72±19.29)g/m2] and left ventricular ejection fraction [(60.65±2.97)% vs (59.58±3.91)% vs (58.54±5.08)%] among 3 groups (all P<0.05). Cox regression model analysis showed that after adjustment for gender, age, comorbidities, laboratory indicators and echocardiographic indicators, the mortality risk was significantly higher in the patients of the high-value group than those in the low-value group (HR=3.133,95%CI 1.381-7.109, P<0.01). Survival curve analysis indicated that median survival time was estimated at 53,51 and 48 months in the low-, median- and high-value groups, respectively. And in 10-20 months after discharge, the survival rate of the high-value group was significantly lower than that of the other two groups, and even in 20-30 months after discharge, the rate of the high-value group and the median-value group was obviously lower than that of the low-value group. Log-Rank test showed that the survival rates of the three groups was significantly different (P<0.001). Conclusion For the frail and pre-frail elderly inpatients without ACS, higher hs-cTnT level, higher than the cut-off value, indicates higher risk of death. The increment exerts adverse effect on all-cause death, with the higher the level, the higher risk of death.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张少景,王青,崔云婧,杨卉,符琳琳.高敏肌钙蛋白T对非急性冠脉综合征老年住院衰弱患者预后的影响[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2023,22(2):97~102

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-28
  • 出版日期: