急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管成像斑块定量分析的对比研究
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心心血管内科,北京 100853;2. 中国人民解放军总医院第六医学中心心血管病医学部,北京 100048;3. 中国人民解放军总医院第二医学中心心血管内科,北京 100853)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R541.4

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1300304)


Comparative study of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography analysis of coronary plaques in patients with acute coronary syndrome
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Department of Cardiology, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China;2. Senior Department of Cardiology, Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China;3. Department of Cardiology, Second Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 应用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管成像(CCTA)斑块定量分析,比较急性冠脉综合征(ACS)和稳定性冠心病(SCAD)患者冠状动脉斑块成分与负荷特征。方法 回顾性纳入2021年1月至3月就诊于中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心心血管内科的116例冠心病(CAD)患者的临床资料,根据患者临床诊断结果将其分为ACS组(81例)和SCAD组(35例)。2组患者均在14d内先后接受CCTA和冠状动脉造影检查。采用CCTA斑块定量分析软件测量各类斑块成分体积及负荷、最小管腔直径和重构指数(RI)、偏心指数(EI)等影像学指标并比较分析。采用SPSS 20.0软件进行数据分析。根据数据类型,组间比较分别采用t检验、Wilcoxon检验及χ2检验。结果 ACS组患者较SCAD组患者具有更大的总斑块负荷(TPB)、非钙化成分负荷(NCPB)和脂质成分负荷(LPB),差异均有统计学意义[(60.5±11.2)%和(51.7±14.4)%,(58.9±12.0)%和(50.1±15.2)%,17.9%(11.6%,27.6%)和14.2%(7.5%,20.8%),均P<0.05]。斑块各类成分体积、钙化成分负荷(CPB)、RI和EI的组间差异均无统计学意义。ACS患者的罪犯病变较非罪犯病变具有更大的TPB、NCPB和LPB,差异均有统计学意义[(62.3±10.4)%和(54.8±10.6)%,(60.7±11.0)%和(52.4±11.0)%,(19.7±10.3)%和(15.1±9.2)%,均P<0.05)]。此外,罪犯病变较非罪犯病变具有更小的CPB[0.5%(0.0,2.6)%和1.5%(0.3,3.6)%,P<0.05]。结论 通过CCTA斑块定量分析技术测量斑块成分构成后发现,ACS患者和罪犯病变呈现出更高的TPB、NCPB和LPB。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the plaque composition and burden between patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and those with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) using quantitative plaque assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Methods A total of 116 patients in the Department of Cardiology, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2021 to March 2021 were retrospectively included, who were divided into the ACS group (n=81) and the SCAD group (n=35) according to the clinical diagnosis. All the patients underwent CCTA and coronary angiography within 14 days after the diagnosis. A CCTA software for plaque quantification analysis was used to measure such imaging features as plaque component volume and burden, minimal lumen diameter (MLD), remodeling index (RI), and eccentric index (EI). SPSS 20.0 was used for statistical analysis. Depending on the data type, data comparison between two groups was performed using t-test, Wilcoxon test or χ2test.Results The ACS patients had higher total plaque burden (TPB), non-calcified component burden (NCPB), and lipid component burden (LPB), the differences being statistically significant[(60.5±11.2)% vs (51.7±14.4)%,(58.9±12.0)% vs (50.1±15.2)%,17.9%(11.6%,27.6%) vs 14.2%(7.5%, 20.8%),all P<0.05]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in plaque component volume, calcification component burden (CPB), RI and EI. In the ACS patients, the culprit lesions had higher TPB, NCPB and LPB than the non-culprit lesions[(62.3±10.4)% vs (54.8±10.6)%,(60.7±11.0)% vs (52.4±11.0)%,(19.7±10.3)% vs (15.1±9.2)%,all P<0.05)]. In addition, the culprit lesions had smaller CPB than non-culprit lesions[0.5%(0.0,2.6)% vs 1.5%(0.3,3.6)%,P<0.05]. Conclusion Quantitative CCTA analysis of the coronary plaque composition revealed that patients with ACS and culprit lesions show higher TPB, NCPB and LPB.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王蔚然,王玺,窦冠华,何柏,荆晶,单冬凯.急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管成像斑块定量分析的对比研究[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2022,21(9):665~669

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-30
  • 出版日期: