Clinical efficiency of robot system assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for treatment of knee osteoarthritis in elderly patients
Received:November 02, 2020  
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Key words:aged  robotic surgery system  unicompartmental knee arthroplasty This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing-Original Innovation Joint Fund of Haidian District, Beijing
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
YIN Cai-Xia Department of Anesthesiology, 343315695@qq.comclinical 
LIN Mu-Dan Department of Nursing, Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China 343315695@qq.comclinical 
CHAI Wei Department of Orthopedics, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China 343315695@qq.comclinical 
Hits: 530
Download times: 453
      Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of robot system assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and traditional surgery in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly patients. Methods A total of 78 elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted to Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2018 to June 2020 were prospectively recruited in this study. They were randomly divided into observation group (n=39) and the control group (n=39), with the former group undergoing robot system-assisted UKA and the latter traditional surgery. Their perioperative data, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 8,16, 24 h after surgery, and knee society score (KSS) at 6 months postoperatively were collected and compared between the 2 groups. Results The observation group had significantly longer operation time [(155±22) vs (135±22) min] and shorter use time of intraoperative tourniquet [(27±10) vs (40±9) min], and obviously less total blood loss on the second day after operation [(476±290) vs (536±215) ml] when compared with the control group (all P<0.05). The VAS scores at 8 and 16 h after surgery were (3.2±1.2) and (1.8±0.8) points in the observation group and (4.6±1.4) and (2.3±1.1) points in the control group, and significant differences were seen between the 2 groups (all P<0.05). But no such difference was observed in the score at 24 h [(1.1±0.3) vs (1.2±0.5) points, P>0.05]. At 6 months postoperatively, statistical differences were seen in the KSS score [(78±11) vs (90±6)points] and functional score [(70±16) vs (79±12)points] between 2 groups (both P<0.05). Conclusion Robot system-assisted UKA can provide excellent precision and safety through a minimally invasive approach, and promote postoperative knee function recovery in patients.